Knowing as Light - with TSK - (part 2)

I'll try and describe the recent result of my TSK class involving the practice of looking at knowing as light in experience. The description leans less toward the scientific precision of parsing, and more toward the openness of the poetic. This post is a continuation of my previous post, Knowing as Light - with TSK - (Part 1).
This week I was working with Exercise 21 from "Dynamics of Time and Space", called Healing through Light. The exercise asks us:
"Once you have touched the full experience of the presence of space and time, invite into this presence a quality of light. This light has no source; instead, it is a centerless luminosity. In a sense it is nothing special--simply the openness that allows space and time to appear.
Comment from the book
Access to the light within appearance depends on activating mind without fixation. On the relative level, this mind belongs neither here nor there. It does not occupy space or time or pronounce knowledge; it takes no shape and establishes no relationship with either existence or non-existence.
In conventional terms, we would say that such a 'not-belonging' mind is simply 'not there'. But 'not there' is itself a kind of fixation. Only if 'not there' is not so can 'there' not be.
Although we can speak of 'not there', it has no basis: no something that makes it 'be there'. Nor can the 'not thereness' of this basis be founded. If 'no basis' has a meaning, it will become a basis for excluding light. If it has no meaning, it will lead to the lostness of the dark. Perhaps it is better not to focus on 'not there' at all. As an alternative, we could say of mind and its experience: "Never born."
My practice notes:
I sat this morning before the sun rose with no purpose other than to sit without nodding off. In the middle of the silence, a calm slowly dawned, like diminishing shadows in a valley. I came to a perspective where observing was spacious. Space was more than just area between objects, but felt like a knowing of a valley of contours only because the light allowed shadows. The light was awareness before individual differentiation. Freedom from the pressures of daily identity and no need for moment-to-moment reassurance was noticed. Noticeable by whom? Noticeable to a shadow-self allowed to co-exist within the light, but which can become enlightened. There is an alternating as mind process carries away thoughts and feelings between me and not me. Observance alternates with object-less, concept-less knowing, the moments mix and entwine in recognition of light with shadows of not-knowing in a rhythm. There is this sympathetic interweaving of rhythmic flows, like breath, one full of self, timed with intent and looking for things; then alternating with its focused release, emptiness, weightlessness, freedom from measurement and meaning - lightness.
I felt one moment my diaphragm was reflexively tightening as attention was gripping thought: Clenching it with body language as mental language carried me away with a story line - then sudden realization, 'clarity' - seeing the process. In that seeing was letting go of the linearity of story; space opening into knowing space, the knowing capacity, the light... something like immense relief as in letting go an isometric clenching, but feeling that opening expand exponentially.
In terms of color, I often see internal light (with eyes closed) as a glowing perspective, like a golden-reddish glow in the dark, as the picture above shows without any objects in it. But often there can be blues, rust, white light, and others too. Knowing has a warm and energetic feel when I allow a more open access to it. While it's true, I'm looking with my eyes at the inside of my eyelids, however, not focusing on what the eye sees, allows a deeper, more occipital kind of seeing. Beyond a certain point there is just light, until darkness is approached. If total darkness comes it happens as 'a blackout', as if going to sleep, except I'm not asleep, just gone - no light; and when the blackout goes, the light of awareness returns.
The blackout is curious to me, and Rinpoché says in the exercise, "If 'no basis' has a meaning, it will become a basis for excluding light. If it has no meaning, it will lead to the lostness of the dark. Perhaps it is better not to focus on 'not there' at all." In this statement he seems to point toward the light, that the point of the time, space, and knowledge vision is in the light of knowing and not-knowing, and not the blackout, which is the absence of light and TSK.
---------------------------------------
Footnote:
I've tried to make an obvious distinction between, on the one hand, a non-conscious 'blackout' where there is no light and no experience, and on the other hand, a conscious knowing in the light of awareness where not-knowing is also active, like looking at the moon, one seems to be the darkside of the other. Going into the light of full awareness without preserving concepts or images, 'not-knowing' as 'a knowledge gap' becomes openness itself, which is the source of knowing, a pure, awakened awareness, and it is not the 'blackout' I spoke about where consciousness seems to lapse. If there is any interest, I've written a little more about 'the blackout' experience (or lack thereof) on the TSK Pod, under Practicing the Vision, here.
Rinpoché says regarding conscious knowing in the light of awareness:
The 'blackout' experience was significant to me because it showed me in a lucid way a kind of beginning or 'edge', as if the switching on of the 'light of knowing', the 'zero space', before distinctions began to become evident and proliferate, it showed the process with clarity. A little like waking up from sleep but more clear and brighter without any grogginess.A 'zero space' before distinctions will appear to ordinary consciousness as a blank, unknown and unknowable. But this not-knowing is simply an expression of ordinary patterns. Not to know in this sense means simply that we cannot give what appears a position within an 'order'; we cannot make it accessible to the senses or to logic. Because we cannot rationalize it, we also cannot assign it a value or determine how to evaluate it.
Instead of accepting this not-knowing as the final word, we are free to go into it, looking for knowledge of a different kind. There is an opportunity to step back to a point 'before' the known world arises, and ask in a new way where we come from.
In making this move to a 'zero space', we have the opportunity to look at something that we ordinarily miss: We are so busy 'pointing out' and 'pointing to' that we never look at the pointing or ask after the source. Perhaps what appears is a creation of the pointing process, or perhaps the pointing participates in implementing what is created in some other way.
Entering the neutrality before distinctions helps break the hold that distinctions have over us. Distinctions are seen to depend on positions and points of reference; when we choose, we are choosing within a presupposed framework that gives the choice meaning. At times this framework is spatial, so that the mind in effect 'borrows' the physical locatedness of the body. At other times the framework is better understood in temporal terms, as when we engage in perception of a world that has been 'measured out' in advance.
Through cultivating the 'zero mind' of 'zero space', we can investigate directly the arising of conventional structures through which the self seeks to possess appearance--the 'feedback system' of recording, recognition, identification, and representation. Continued practice lets us return to presentation before possession or position, undoing the momentum of identification. [DTS p. 175-6]
Learning the difference between entering Consciousness without content from simply falling asleep, the former being drawn almost irresistibly into it, and the latter, from a position of alert readiness as feeling, identity and perspective all fall away resulting in void. It is my belief that had there been a noise, a touch, or some other interruption I would have instantly registered that as conscious input along with perspective, identity, feeling, etc. Regardless, some time later I did emerge from that void alert, as perspective, identity, as feeling returned. You learn about what you are made of, what constitutes your contextual world, you learn that to open into openness is not a loss of anything.

Help




“The description leans less toward the scientific precision of parsing, and more toward the openness of the poetic.”
This statement is tremendously helpful in shush-ing my brain's left-side :)
Your delicate description of dawn is lovely…
Can you help me understand the “blackout” better? If there is no “there” or “not there”, past or future, can there similarly be “light” or “blackout”? Or does “blackout” refer to an untapped, undeveloped, latent knowledge - not absent. As if one reaches the momentary edge of knowledge and the “blackout” ahead (?) does Light expand into the darkness as one moves through the (now former) darkness, Space? Can “no experience” exist in Time, if Time does not consist of a past or future?
Being new to this material, I consider my questions may seem very elementary :) I will explore futher: ”If there is any interest, I've written a little more about 'the blackout' experience (or lack thereof) on the TSK Pod, under Practicing the Vision, here.”
”[…]you learn that to open into openness is not a loss of anything.”
To open into openness seems to open into discovering light-rich, knowledge-saturating treasure…
…Erin
Back with some further thoughts on “blackout.” I see “blackout” as the space beyond the point of expansion and emergence. What I'm having trouble reconciling is how it can exist in infinite space and time. Or does it “exist” only for those on the edge of further revealed knowledge as they are exploring and discovering, sort of as space and time not yet illuminated (for them, individually)? Or maybe I should read the books further, first?
:)
Erin
I was trying to figure out how to respond to these questions…
“Or does “blackout” refer to an untapped, undeveloped, latent knowledge - not absent. As if one reaches the momentary edge of knowledge and the “blackout” ahead (?) does Light expand into the darkness as one moves through the (now former) darkness, Space?”
And I saw that you hadn't read the link yet. At the link I talk about what I experienced, of course, and I'm making no proclamations about how things are in the universe. They are just descriptions of how I found time unfolding at the edge of space. The idea, of course, is to invite your own TSK exploration and discovery. But then I saw you went to the link and saw 'blackout' as beyond the point of expansion and emergence, which is how I saw it too.
As to your question: Can “no experience” exist in Time, if Time does not consist of a past or future? And if I understand the question correctly, I could say that while I was blacked out, in a 'no experience' state in terms of knowing, my physical body still occupied space and time, but the memories of past or intentions in the future were not present. But 'I', the light of knowing was, in a sense, absent.
Some years ago I was reading the 4th Diamond Heart book by A. H. Almaas, and came across his description of what I experienced. He calls the 'black-out' the 'Absolute'. It's not TSK, which deals with the convergence of time, space, and knowledge.
“…The Absolute…is fundamental…the furthest you can go. If the Absolute is experiencing the Absolute, the experience is that there is no experience. If I experience myself as Absolute, then the experience is 'I don't know.' I don't know anything. And I don't know that I don't know. “I don't know' means that I am not conscious. I am not conscious of anything and I don't know I am not conscious of anything. It is similar to deep sleep. It's as if there is nothing there. You are gone, absolutely gone. You're out of it… It is the ultimate deepest nature of everything. It is the level of existence, of beingness, where there is not even the perception of beingness. You are beingness. You are so deep, you don't know you are there… Being in the Absolute completely happens only in a state of profound meditation or in a state of deep sleep.
“The ultimate nature of things is sometimes called the Absolute, sometimes called the Void…The ultimate essence of everything, including the human being, is a complete absence of all that can be experienced and the absence of knowing that there is nothing to experience. It is a complete lack of self-consciousness, and an absence of consciousness of anything. That is the ultimate source - the Origin. This does not mean there is nothing there. You are, you exist, but you are aware of it only when you come out of it, when there is some consciousness. The quality of the Absolute is that it is not conscious of itself. In the Absolute, consciousness does not exist yet; it is not yet manifest…sometimes called the 'unmanifest.'”
I have provisionally held this explanation of my experience as okay for now, subject to further inquiry… I find the Epigraph to the 'Time Space Knowledge' book particularly inviting when it comes to my TSK explorations, p.xxxii…
“Central to the very heart of reality, a beautiful vision is available – when we can ‘see' without adopting limiting positions. This vision concerns Space, which is primordially peaceful, open. In its openness, it is an open-ended accommodating of various views, all welling up, floating, gathering within Space. Although undisturbed, it is filled with appearance. Space is therefore not static, but is instead a serene explosion of expanding creativity, filling all the eons of pasts and futures, without exhausting its openness or its capacity for exhibiting a further wealth of presences…
All that emerges does so as part of a ballet performed by Space. The dance is vast, far-flung, even illimitable. But each dancer leaps up, draws apart, and retires, while remaining inseparable from the nourishing expansiveness of Space.
Colors, forms, all experience, art, music, philosophy-are expressions of Space. While engaging in an intertwining, completely interpenetrating dance, they are still a free-flowing presence of translucent outlines and surfaces. Each engagement is a profound and mysterious enactment of central import, marking out the traceless, centerless center of reality. Each individual presence is this open-ended centerless center … Space.
When a single feather and a thousand worlds
Are equally this space
Who can say which contains which?
Who can find limits
To life's richness?”
David,
Thank you so much for your thoughtful reply to my questions and thoughts.
I appreciate the opportunity to read your notes as you experienced the variety of exercises; they offer additional faceted perspectives, thus, providing new insights complimenting my own experiences and ongoing explorations and discovering.
Sometimes when asking questions, I am thinking out loud in a casual brainstorming style… I'll soon direct some thoughts and questions into a few journal entries within my Gaia blog :) and plan on more actively participating within the TSK pod.
Thank you for your kind patience and for sharing your journey through TS and K.
It is the journey that is such great pleasure!
Very best,
Erin